| 
 Postgraduate Course: Dissertation MSc by Research Social and Political Science (International Development) (PGSP11565)
Course Outline
| School | School of Social and Political Science | College | College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences |  
| Credit level (Normal year taken) | SCQF Level 11 (Postgraduate) |  
| Course type | Dissertation | Availability | Available to all students |  
| SCQF Credits | 120 | ECTS Credits | 60 |  
 
| Summary | The dissertation is an extended piece of independent scholarship. It is the main work in which students demonstrate achievement
 of crucial learning outcomes for the MSc by Research, drawing on
 relevant material covered in the taught element of the degree
 and through supervision. The dissertation can be up to 18,000
 words in length.
 The nature of a dissertation for the MSc by Research may vary.
 For students proceeding to a PhD or MPhil, it will normally take
 the form of a full research proposal. Alternatively, the
 dissertation may comprise a discrete piece of (usually empirical)
 research, possibly a pilot study for the eventual doctoral research
 or a standalone project.
 |  
| Course description | 1) Academic description The dissertation is an extended piece of writing of up to 18,000
 words, based on independent study of a topic largely of the
 student¿s own choosing. It tests the ability to conduct research
 autonomously, to organise effectively bigger quantities of
 information and to communicate research findings in a fluent and
 structured fashion. The topic is negotiated with a supervisor from
 within the School of Social and Political Science.
 2) Outline Content
 This is a supervised course in which students work autonomously,
 and will have a great deal of freedom to choose their own
 content.
 The nature of a dissertation for the MSc by Research may vary.
 For students proceeding to a PhD or MPhil, it will normally take
 the form of a full research proposal. In this case, it will contain an
 extended review of the literature, establishing the research
 questions, plus an extended discussion of the likely research
 design and any methodological issues. Alternatively, the
 dissertation may comprise a discrete piece of (usually empirical)
 research, possibly a pilot study for the eventual doctoral research
 or a standalone project. This will usually incorporate literature
 review, research questions, research design and methodology,
 The Graduate School of Social and Political Science
 data collection and analysis elements, discussion and
 conclusions.
 3) Student learning experience
 The course consists of independent study and research, under
 the guidance of a supervisor. The timetable is for students to
 negotiate with their supervisor. Supervision meetings will be
 regular. In the initial period the aim is to narrow down a broader
 research topic and to discuss the student¿s emerging ideas.
 Advice will be given on what to read. This is followed by a focus -
 in due course - on draft chapters of the dissertation.
 |  
Entry Requirements (not applicable to Visiting Students)
| Pre-requisites |  | Co-requisites |  |  
| Prohibited Combinations |  | Other requirements | None |  
Information for Visiting Students 
| Pre-requisites | None |  
		| High Demand Course? | Yes |  
Course Delivery Information
|  |  
| Academic year 2025/26, Not available to visiting students (SS1) | Quota:  None |  | Course Start | Flexible |  Timetable | Timetable | 
| Learning and Teaching activities (Further Info) | Total Hours:
1200
(
 Dissertation/Project Supervision Hours 7,
 Programme Level Learning and Teaching Hours 24,
Directed Learning and Independent Learning Hours
1169 ) |  
| Assessment (Further Info) | Written Exam
0 %,
Coursework
100 %,
Practical Exam
0 % |  
 
| Additional Information (Assessment) | Written Exam 0 %, Coursework 100 %, Practical Exam 0 % Assessment criteria:
 1. Formulation and presentation of research problem
 2. Review of literature and contextualisation of study
 3. Discussion of methods used to collect and analyse relevant information, including ethics
 4. Development and coherence of arguments
 5. Use of supporting evidence and evaluation of evidence
 6. Drawing together major arguments by way of conclusion in relation to the original research
 problem
 7. Degree of reflexivity and critical thinking; originality of argument
 8. Formal presentation of dissertation: correct referencing and quoting; spelling, grammar and style;
 lay-out and visual presentation.
 |  
| Feedback | This field should be used to describe the assessment and feedback strategies used on the course, along with their indicative pattern and schedule of feedback.
 The supervisor will:
 -  help to define the research problem and focus of the argument and topic;
 - advise on the structure of your dissertation;
 - advise on the methods and on the coherence of the dissertation;
 - give advice on relevant bodies of literature to get the research started or refer to another member
 of staff for suggestions on sources;
 - discuss and approve draft outlines and timetables of the work;-  provide comment and constructive suggestions on at least one full chapter and maximum two chapters.
 |  
| No Exam Information |  
Learning Outcomes 
| On completion of this course, the student will be able to: 
        Carry out a sustained piece of independent scholarship, involving project and time managementFrame and design a coherent and answerable set of research questions, to justify these in relation to existing knowledge and theories, and to demonstrate that answering them would constitute an advance on existing knowledge.Achieve a command of existing knowledge in their field of research, through a critical review of relevant literature engaging with salient debates.Demonstrate a critical understanding of research methods, appropriate to the research topic and questions, taking due account of any practical, political and ethical issues affecting the conduct of the research.Where relevant, demonstrate the ability to implement the chosen research design and methods of data collection and analysis and produce scholarship that demonstrates the ability to integrate theoretical and empirical element. |  
Reading List 
| Booth, A., Papaioannou, D. and Sutton, A. (2012) Systematic approaches to a successful literature review, London: Sage.
 Bryman, A. (2012) Social Research Methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 Cryer P (2006). The research student¿s guide to success (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
 Dunleavy P (2003). Authoring a PhD thesis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
 Gilbert GN (ed.) (2006). From postgraduate to social scientist. London: Sage.
 Gough, D., Oliver, S. and Thomas, J. (2012) An introduction to systematic reviews, London: Sage.
 Punch KF (2006). Developing effective research proposals (2nd edn.). London: Sage.
 Ridley, D. (2012) The literature review. A step-by-step guide for students (2nd ed.). London: Sage
 |  
Additional Information
| Graduate Attributes and Skills | Independent research: Conduct research and enquiry into relevant issues through research design, the collection and analysis of quantitative and/or qualitative data, synthesising and reporting.
 Analytical thinking: Analysis of data, synthesis and critical appraisal of literature.
 Critical thinking: Capability to evaluate information thoroughly; identifying assumptions, detecting
 contradictory reasoning and defining terms accurately in order to make an informed judgement.
 Numeracy: Proficiency, confidence and competence with numbers and measures.
 Handling complexity and ambiguity: have an understanding of contextually relevant ethics and values,
 follow ethical guidelines, demonstrate reflexivity and positionality in relation to own research topic.
 |  
| Keywords | Not entered |  
Contacts 
| Course organiser | Dr Andrew Bowman Tel: (0131 6)51 1000
 Email:
 | Course secretary | Mr John Riddell Tel: (0131 6)50 9975
 Email:
 |   |  |